What did Richard III really look like? His skeleton turned up under a Leicester car park in 2012. Mitochondrial DNA confirmed the identification. Because of this, we know more about Richard III's physical appearance than almost any other medieval king. He stood about 5'8" with his spine straightened, but adolescent-onset scoliosis (a rightward curve of 70-80° in the thoracic spine) would have reduced his apparent height by several inches and pushed his right shoulder higher than his left.
The skeleton is slender, gracile, with lean limbs. Nikolaus von Popplau, a Silesian knight who met Richard in 1484, confirms this: he described the king as lean with delicate arms and legs. The skull gives precise facial geometry. A narrow, fine-boned face with a strong jaw, straight nose, well-proportioned cranium. The Society of Antiquaries portrait, likely copied from a lost lifetime original, matches the forensic reconstruction closely and fills in what bone can't tell us: dark eyes, thin lips, dark brown hair worn to collar length.
Was Richard III a hunchback? Not the way Shakespeare and Thomas More described. The scoliosis was real but partially concealable under tailored clothing and armour. Both arms were normal. The "withered arm" is Tudor propaganda. DNA analysis suggests he may have had blue eyes and blond hair as a child, which conflicts with the dark colouring in the portraits. Hair commonly darkens with age, which may explain it.